Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Gnomons, Exonyms and air rage

Al Idrisi World Map (Early 12th Cent, Sicily)
Detail of Arabian Pennisula

While travelling back from Australia recently with Etihad Airways I took the opportunity to stop off in Dubai for three days. The United Arab Emirates, and the Emirate of Dubai specifically, were not places I had been to before in my middle-eastern travels and I was genuinely quite curious to experience this modern version of an El Dorado (or perhaps Al Dorado to be culturally sensitive!).

Given the recent property implosion in Dubai the sequence of finished and unfinished, occupied and unoccupied skyscrapers stretching from the Creek at Deira to New Dubai has an uneasy resemblance to a House of Cards that in time will topple in the wind and be swallowed up by the desert sands. But in the meantime what cards they are! Architects have been given the license to push the parameters of steel, concrete and glass to the very edge of their envelopes.

Interior of Burj al Arab

Two memories stand out in particular. The Burj Khalifa tower is quite fantastic. The first night I was there the world’s tallest building stretched towards the three-quarter moon above like a celestial bridge. So alien and yet so belonging! During sunlight hours on the other hand it is a gnomon to the Dubai day. I could not keep my eyes off it even when the synchronized fountain display in the plaza in front of the tower was spurting in all its splendour.

The Burj Khalifa

The second building that amazed was the iconic Burj al Arab. Staring up at the blue, green and golden balcony folds of the interior atrium from the lobby floor was mesmerizing. For me it bore an uncanny resemblance to the roof of the Sultan’s private chambers in the (almost!) incomparable Yesil Cami or Green Mosque in Bursa in Turkey; its blueness, the glittering gold paint, the arabesques and muqarnas vaulting.

Both are places where you just want to lie down flat on your back and look up at the stars. Like a desert night. Quite wonderful.


Anyway to Exonyms and air rage! 

While wandering around the atrium of the Burj al Arab I picked up an English version of the Gulf News newspaper and was immediately struck by an article describing Iran’s demand that any airline flying in Iranian airspace must refer to the body of water between Iran and Arabia as the Persian Gulf. Failure to do so would result in exclusion from their airspace. Reading on I was then appraised of the intensity of feeling over what this body of water is called, a row that continues to simmer. The Arab countries since about 1950 have referred to it as the Arabian Gulf, the BBC call it the Gulf but the Iranians insist on referring to the entire body of water in its historical cartographic attribution as the Persian Gulf.

Now I like old maps and always I have understood the Arabian Gulf to be the old name for the Red Sea (see a 1540 Honter map from my own collection below) and the body of water to the east of Arabia to be the Persian Gulf.



Ibn Khaldun (d1406 CE/808 AH) the Arab polymath (not that beloved it must be said by modern pan-Arab nationalists) called the Persian Gulf the Green Gulf in his famous work the Muqaddimah, the first book of his universal history.

The naming of any geographical territory, which is not directly under a country’s political control is known as Exonymy. I was not aware until following up on this article on getting home that the United Nations has an entire sub-organization entirely dedicated to the Standardization of Geographical names, which meets in conference every five years. Iran has been consistent in pushing the agenda that the entire body of water should continue to be known in the future as the Persian Gulf and they appear to have been successful in this as the most recent UN Secretary-General’s Report on the Oceans and Laws of the Sea maintains the Persian Gulf as a descriptive exonym. (page 32, UN Doc A/64/61/Add 1, 25 November 2009).

I know that there are concerns about global warming and the seas rising but extending the Persian Gulf to 40,000 feet seems a little bit excessive.

Air rage or umbrage? Who knows the mind of a shrimp or seagull?


Further Info:

Reports of the United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names

Alphabetic Philosoup – F



Foucault’s forensic foresight freed fragile Freudian fault
from Faustian facility for fiendish fantasia.
.
.
.
.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Cenomisozoiphobia


A rare Cat indeed!


Tropical cyclone Ului is drawing ever closer to the Queensland shore and the driving, centrifugal rain is forcing me indoors and somewhat introspectively again.

Cenosilicaphobia is a fear of an empty glass and a word that caught my eye while tasting a bottle of The Cenosilicaphobic Cat Sargantino Cinsault when visiting the d'Arenberg winery in McClaren Vale, South Australia recently. Although close to Adelaide where we lived in the late '80s I had not been there before and I enjoyed the lunch we had in the attached d'Arrys Verandah restaurant.It was very enjoyable indeed.

Coming to the end of our meal a retired colleague of our host/driver-guide for the day came over to say hello. Asked how retirement was suiting him he replied, 'Great mate. Every Tuesday lunch here. What more could a person need? Life is a glass half-full.'

And this is true. Yes there is enormous luck and privilege in being able to reach retirement in good health and consider life being a glass half-full. For many it is a glass half-empty and invokes an enormous fear.

CENOMESOZOIPHOBIA
Inspired by d'Arry's cat I have (I think?) derived a new word (or two new words) to describe that fear of a life half-lived. The first is cenomesozoiphobia (ceno-empty, meso-half, zoi-life or spirit) It is one I hope never to experience, or at least in the dark moments experience it as a very temporary event before tilting the glass of being back in my favour. Equally extending the half-glass metaphor for life a little further it could also be cenomesosilicaphobia.

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Crapuccino and Civil Civets

A Civet at The Lodge

Caught in a cloudburst from the leading edge of tropical cyclone Ului on Australia's Gold Coast there is a little time available to me to reflect on Australia and the changes evident since we lived here twenty years ago.
The economy unlike in Ireland and Europe is booming. Unemployment somewhere about 5.8%, house prices soaring, job vacancies across all sectors occupying oceans of newsprint and ... expensive for the visitor. The Australian dollar is strong and it reflects a vast mineral wealth and the concerted effort, twenty to thirty years ago, to swing Australia's economic orientation away from west to east.
Some things don't change however. In particular the very Australian way of using descriptive nouns.
In every day language and print but particularly within the political sphere their use falls somewhere between disdain and defammatory.
Take for example the recent visit of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to Australia.
Apart from waiting until desert during the State Banquet to gleefully announce the very recent killing "execution" of a wanted terrorist ( Australia in recent days has just passed legislation banning for ever in all terrotories capital punishment and torture) Yudhoyono brought as a present to Prime Minister Rudd (apart from the metaphorical head of the Bali bomber who had been trailed by police for sometime but 'conveniently' was only killed to coincide with the visit of SBY to Australia) a gift of rare luwak coffee.
Now kopi luwak coffee is made from the extracted beans found in the excrement of Asian civets. The political commentators could not contain themselves. Laurie Oaks however, in the best of 'keatingesque' barbs, was to announce the gift as 'A new treat at the Lodge: crapuccino!'
Brilliant! Hubris mud-slinging and froth in one mouthful.
Ah the rain has stopped. Time to move again.

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Israel – Ambiguity of Reason in the Assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabouth

The Assassination of Mussolini


I thought that I would not get around to blogging for a while but with time to ‘kill’ while waiting for my plane I could not but try and respond to the Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman’s avoidance of acknowledging Mossad’s role in the assassination of the Hamas official al-Mabouth by saying Israel had a ‘policy of ambiguity’ on intelligence matters.

There is always a knee-jerk reaction from Israel when anybody criticises the workings of its’ State apparatus that any criticisim directed towards it somehow carries an anti-semitic slant or agenda and as a result all the weight of a Holocaust memory is brought to bear on that criticism. Despite this puerile reaction it must be acknowledged even by the most orthodox that not all Jews are Israeli citizens, and more importantly not all Israeli citizens, as is obvious from the State’s apartheid documents of identity, are Jews. Any criticism of Israel’s dysfunctional state is exactly that: a criticism of the State not of any particular member or branch of the family of Shem.

A policy of strategic or deliberate ambiguity has long been a policy of Israel where its nuclear weapons or intelligence and security matters have come up for discussion or debate. Israel has also had a long-term policy of political assassination and qualified those actions on the basis of ‘pre-emptive’ self-defence citing Article 51 of the United Nations Charter:

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.

Although required by the Charter it is most unlikely that Israel will be rushing to inform the Security Council as exactly what was Mossad’s role in the assassination of al-Mabouth, yet it is something they resort to when they are attacked:

Identical letters dated 1 December 2009 from the Permanent
Representative of Israel to the United Nations addressed to the
Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council



I write this letter of complaint regarding a series of attacks emanating from the
Gaza Strip which is controlled by the Hamas terrorist organization.

On 13 November 2009, a rocket was launched from the Gaza Strip, and
between 18 November 2009 and 24 November 2009 four additional rockets were
fired from the Gaza Strip. Furthermore, on 16 November 2009, two mortar shells
were fired from Gaza. All of these rockets and mortars landed in the Western Negev
region of Israel adjacent to many small cities. While such attacks intentionally target
Israeli civilians, no serious casualties or damage was sustained.

I wish to reiterate that in response to these armed attacks, and in exercise of its
inherent right to self-defence under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations,
Israel will take all necessary measures to protect its citizens from the threat of
terrorism.

I should be grateful if you would have the present letter distributed as a
document of the Security Council.


(Signed) Gabriela Shalev
Ambassador
Permanent Representative




Although a signatory of the Rome Statute of the ICC in December 2000 Israel has taken the decision not to ratify its provisions. Article 8 2.B(xi) of ICC Rome Statute under the War Crimes section declares that a war crime is the:

Killing or wounding treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army.

It is interesting that in 2000 Israel attached the following note to its’ signature on the Rome Statute:

“Nevertheless, as a democratic society, Israel has been conducting ongoing political, and academic debates concerning the ICC and its significance in the context of international law and the international community. The Court’s essentiality - as a vital means of ensuring that criminals who commit genuinely heinous crimes will be duly brought to justice, while other potential offenders of the fundamental principles of humanity and the dictates of public conscience will be properly deterred - has never seized to guide us. Israel’s signature of the Rome Statute will, therefore, enable it to morally identify with this basic idea, underlying the establishment of the Court.”

By 2002 however Israel had decided not to ratify the Statute. It said in a note to the Secretary General of the UN:

".....in connection with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted on 17 July 1998, [...] Israel does not intend to become a party to the treaty. Accordingly, Israel has no legal obligations arising from its signature on 31 December 2000. Israel requests that its intention not to become a party, as expressed in this letter, be reflected in the depositary’s status lists relating to this treaty."

This ambiguity of both purpose and intent can be best explained by the fact that since 2001 Israel has considered itself at war with Hamas and that ‘law-enforcement’ legal constraints with regard to assassinations no longer apply … if they ever did.

In 1981 Ronald Regan’s Executive Order 12333 banned all US conducted assassinations however it is obvious that in the ‘War on Terror’ many have been US sanctioned and condoned. There is equal ambiguity in the US response to al-Mabouth’s death.

In March of 2009 I visited Alamut Castle (see picture below) in Iran, the near-impregnable castle of the Federation of Assassins founded by Hassan i-Sabah in the 11th Century. The asymmetrical tactics and procedures developed by Hassan are no less evident today in the activities of Mossad.




Further Reading:

Michael L. Gross, Fighting by Other Means in the Mideast: a Critical Analysis of Israel’s
Assassination Policy. At: http://poli.haifa.ac.il/~mgross/Fighting%20by%20other%20means%20in%20the%20mideast.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashshashin

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Transhumance




No one, including those individuals with just the merest aspiration to compassion and understanding, could fail to be moved by thoughts of the oxygen deprived and almost medieval death of men, women and trusting children trapped in sealed containers that arrive daily in Western Europe. What drives these refugees to this end? What force could be strong enough to uproot them from their homelands in the expectation of a better life that they would jeopardise that same life in order to attain it? What makes these particular human beings want to breathe the air of a new dawn in a different place, where they suppose the distinction between the citizen and the barbarian is irrelevant, and then have that basic right to breath denied to them by a commercial miscalculation in the purgatory of a marshalling yard in Belgium or France.

Transhumance – literally meaning ‘across the ground’ – describes the seasonal sheparding movement of animals and was learnt first by Australopithecus in places near the margins of the East African Rift Valley, like Olduvai, from the stalking and killing of migrating herds across the Serengeti. The same transhumance took Homo Erectus, and fire, out of Africa about one million years ago to eventually become the hunter-gatherer sapient artists of Palaeolithic Europe. The same transhumance ten thousand years ago brought with it, out of the Caucasus, the pottery and ritual of domestication, the origins of a Proto Indo-European language, and the dissemination of ideas with that early language ability.

The language and ideas of transhumance evolved to understand and debate the concepts of reason and duty in the conduct and care of that mobile society. It was realised very early on that illness and injury affected the weak and the strong, the wise and the stupid, the rich and the poor and the good and the evil so the duty of care could not be selective. One of our early ancestors, perhaps a victim, realized that broken bones do heal and that even if left to die on the previous season’s migration an individual might actually survive. Perhaps that same ancestor thought of the simple concept of splinting the broken limb in order that it might heal straighter and therefore with less likelihood of a survivor crippling the next seasons trek. Perhaps as well it was that same ancestor who, in his desire to survive, also realized that storage could help overcome seasonal fluctuation.

The divested potshards and undigested grains of Anatolian and Mesopotamian archaeology reflect that change. With storage came settlement, enclosure, irrigation, prosperity, proprietorship, the development of the identifying seals of that proprietorship and ultimately, in a rational sequence, writing. It was called civilization.

The new writing recorded a mythology of great journeys but the transhumance society that created that mythology was soon corralled by the sovereign proprietor’s desire to manipulate the seasons and the commerce of those seasons. The annual inundation of the Nile was monitored and anticipated. The Pharaohs entrusted chancellors, like Joseph, to stock and control the large storage grain silos that allowed those same sovereign proprietors to ride out the savage intent of seasonal disappointment. Furthermore, and deliberate in its intent to suppress a notion of seasonal freedom, the early Greek civilisers took it upon themselves to name those same Seasons, children of Zeus and Themis, as Peace, Order and Justice.

Given this new agenda and a new architecture of ritual enclosure, transhumance communities were forced to settle. These settled communities then split into the citizens, who spoke the language within, and the barbarians – literally the tongue-tied – without, who couldn’t. That distinction alone became enough of a justification for slavery. Transhumance and its reliance on memory and duty fell fowl of the new civilizations' ‘reasoned’ legislative and restrictive language of obligation.

Obligation to whom, it might be asked.

In time recollections distorted and Truth suffered. Human society, as Nietzsche pointed out, no longer saw itself as the product of a history of errors made but was in fact was the result of a mysterious secret and powerful prescription. Chaos was irrational and dangerous. The druids and the priests appropriated this ‘so-called’ secret from the wise - who knew better - and interpreted its Truth as they saw fit for the people. In time this loss of Truth, already a distant memory, was capitalised on – the term capitalists originally referred to the seasonal sheep drovers of Arles in Southern France – by those who saw profit in that loss. The barterers of the new truths became the lead members and garrison commanders of society.

Further transhumance became an embarrassment and a reflection of primitive irrational failure rather than mankind’s first great achievement. Journey’s end was usually civilization’s ghettos of segregation and isolation and what Michel Foucault determined to be the inexorable development of the all-pervasive and restrictive gridlock of our present existence and experience – the Grid. Society, and by extension society’s institutions, promoted defined spaces for individuals so that those individuals could be controlled primarily and segregated if necessary; particularly if they happened to be barbarians and did not speak the language – in the broadest sense - of their controllers.

In exploring the notion, and promotion, of segregation and isolation we have only to consider how health care, justice and information are delivered within present day society.

Health Care.

As one of the first ideas, and earliest ideal conceptions, the health care of transhumance quickly got lost in the labyrinthine language of the ghettos. Hospitals, from their earliest beginnings in the Asclepieion of Greece, to the Valetudinaria of Rome, the Xenones of Byzantium, to the bimaristans of the Umayyads, to the lazaretto and Hospitaller templates of medieval and modern monoliths, became the deliberately smug encapsulation of all that ‘progress’. They, like the values they reflect, are held up as proof positive of our evolution and are allowed to milk most of the economic applause of society. They are the gridlock par excellence.

The physicians of gagged obligation and self-interest have displaced Immanuel Kant’s metaphysicians of reason and duty. Within the grid, enormous hierarchical empowerment has the facility to both mine and countermine the ethical bedrock and the coalface of health care delivery. Within the grid, individuals, and as a former specialist I include myself in this assessment, are sometimes dazzled by their own importance, and indeed, are sometimes so encouraged in this bedazzlement that they forget what really is important. Present day health care delivery thrives on the notion of prioritisation. Sectional interests predominate and the duty of care to the transhumance barbarians, those people outside the grid, whom are everything we once all were, is ignored.

Prioritisation is the fundamental principal, and flaw, of the Grid.

Justice.

Justice fares little better. Prisons are what Hospitals are. Courts determine the priority. Despite attempts to return to the basic values of transhumance by promoting the concept of human rights and human rights legislation, most of that legislation has been defined within the constraints of the Grid where obligation transcends duty. The sovereign proprietors barter ratification of legislation.

The original language of duty applied to all humanity was a transparent intuitive language of the open ground of human interaction. The language and legislation of obligation, the language that determines our present day lives, has been defined in camera, in an enclosure safe from ‘irrational’ barbarian interpretation. It is a language demanded and expected from the judiciary, by the camerarii – the chancellors of the Grid. It is a hidden language, a perpetuation of druidic interpretation. Its bedrock is an assumed notion of having a unique understanding of the Truth and that same bedrock’s only purpose is to support the foundations of the Grid. Precedent is lauded as that Truth and its values are determined by those druids who can best manipulate the language of obligation and the compensation for that obligation. Priority is given to the ideal result rather than the ideal conception.

Precedent is not the Truth, it is a perpetuation of previous priority.

Because of this prioritisation, because of this flaw, unless there is a renewal, justice will never serve the interests of the barbarian or indeed, humanity. A new or renewed language is required.

Information.

Information dispersal and the technology of that dispersal is also a unique and fascinating aspect of modern day life. The Internet, originally threatening to the camerarii of the Truth, has now been recaptured into the Grid. Initially overwhelmed by the transhumance freedom of the concept, the priority now – as exemplified by the containment of astronomical data - is to encapsulate the huge amount of information available within defined grid cells, where seekers and researchers can access but also can be observed and controlled. The internet has become Netlock. Civilization has once again reemployed the Seasons of Peace, Order and Justice.

The Truth.

To what end? Transhumance and its intuition will never go away. Today, economic transhumance of a frightening scale still occurs, but it is no longer across open ground. It is driven not by seasonal rains but by the winds of war, depravation, cruelty, greed and absence of reason. It is found, in the suffocating airlessness of a wrongly sheparded road container, in the hostile repulsive seas of a continent once emboldened by the hopes and aspirations of previous migrants, in the vacant drug-extinguished eyes of transported sex workers, and in the hearts of ‘civilized’ men whose language has lost its voice.

Today’s transhumance retains a hope of expectation, yet that expectation flounders on the prioritisation of the Grid, where the language of Truth is denied to the newcomer, because we have forgotten what the Truth is.

The Truth is Freedom.

Kant said of ‘freedom’ that it is an ideal conception, which can never be comprehended or understood. Because nothing, including precedent or prioritisation, can explain it or support its Will then nothing remains except its defence. We must remove objections to Freedom rather than impose defined grids of justification. For the sake of all transhumance, let us ignore the prioritisations of Peace, Order and Justice and extend the Good Will of Freedom for its own sake alone.


Young grandson Leon and myself.
Leaving home.


By luck rather than design, and it is something that I appreciate with every breath I take, I have that Freedom.

It is nearly March, the month that I migrate... somewhere.

My next blog will be when I return from wherever that journey takes me.

Alphabetic Philosoup – E

An occasional blog:
an alphabetical abracadabra of language musings.



Erebus’ eternal expression ensures every era’s
empire eventually expires,
even exquisite Eridu.


.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

The Mamzer

The Mamzer – A Short Story




He glides the car in, tight to the kerb and waits, as arranged, outside the Gresham Hotel. Ten minutes pass slowly and he is already full of double-yellow doubts, wondering from which direction she’ll come. He looks at his watch, the dashboard clock, and his watch again: 1.08 a.m. Ahead, the Spire glints, winking back at the few passing cars. Waiting for her reminded him that he had had a point to make back in 2002:

To: Editor, Irish Times.
Madam,
The recent letter asking for an axiomatic appreciation of the impending impact of the Spire on the “axial vistas” of Dublin brought to mind the far greater impact that such structures, placed proud and erect in the urban landscape, have on the landscape of the heart … and the language of the heart.
The “competition winner” will be, I hope, for future generations of young – and not-so-young – Dubliners a place where all their a(spire)ations will be met, although, with such a long-shadow potential its' place in the landscape of the heart may result in a new language of brittle introspective rejection: I was spiked, I missed the point; I got shafted, a poker-choker, hypodermia; she gave me the needle, a Rod-ney, a Vlad (the impaler!), a Milligan, a half-Nelson in deference to the Spike’s previous incarnation. Inevitably gleeful communal commiserations such as, Hey, Stack where’s your wan?, Are ya on probe-ation?, Lance would be fine thing! Etc., etc., etc. will arise.
Yours Sincerely,
James Cuddy,
Albert Road,
Cork.

Leaning forward, his eyes track the polished metal upwards until his nose rubs against the cold glass and his neck hurts. He cannot see the top. Pole-axed, he thinks and then senses somebody is watching him. He half-turns to see a night porter standing in the hotel doorway, staring. He retreats back into the bucket of his seat, and hums Gogarty:

‘Where is Piano Mary, say,
Who dwelt where Hell’s Gates leave the street,
And all the tunes she used to play
Along your spine beneath the sheet?’

The night porter continues to glare at him, descends the steps, and taps on the window. An irritating tap with something metal like a ring or tongue stud, he thinks. He slowly lowers the passenger-side window, fully expecting tonsillar buckshot. The porter is young with a crew-cut head floating above an ill-fitting uniform, the apex of a tattoo just revealing on his pock-skinned neck.

‘… ,’ the porter mumbles.
He remains distracted; does not take in the words, just the intrusion.
‘… ,’ says the porter again.
‘… !’ He keeps looking down the street; tries to bring the posturing to a stop.
‘… ?’ demands the porter, haughtily.
‘ “…” ’ he intones sarcastically.
The porter begins to rant, ‘. . . –’

‘Excuse me,’ he says, holding up a hand between them and then pointing towards her. Unmistakeable! Long legs, beautiful neck, elegant piano-fingers; she squeezes past the porter and pulls open the car door. Sweet smelling, her skirt rides up, disappears almost, as she slides in; she nods, smiles, looks ahead. He says nothing, feels everything: a felt ultimacy beneath. Closing the window, he accelerates away from the curb – and the punctuation – and past the Spire.

He turns left on Lower Abbey Street, past the Playboy’s shed of Felster’s prayer-house; round and round the torture of Beresford; exits onto the quays: North Wall, East Wall, then Alexander; and onwards east, Bligh’s stubborn bounty where Ocean’s waters breasted beyond breakwaters to lap; to suck noisily at granite cracks. Dead of night and, as he had hoped – expected – the docks area is deserted. Discarded tabloids tumbleweed past and full-beam ahead a disturbed mog; it blinks, reflects, scatters. Left behind, the metropolis; having lived the day on its nerves is now a carcass, loving, dying on its knees. And hovering overhead, the vulture beaks of builders’ hoists and the snapped sinews of the East Link bridge, its vertical green array flashing seawards: one way and one way only.

Negotiating the last corner, around the partially demolished warehouse, he exhales with relief. They are still there, he sees, and he exhales again; this time loudly, smugly. His passenger shifts uneasily in her seat, lights up a cigarette and uses the yellow-blue flame of the lighter to look in his direction before the heat from the cheap metal forces her finger from the release. He hesitates for a moment, watches the red tip jitter in the void beyond her fingers, but then ignores her concern, and says nothing. She’ll relax in a minute, once we are there, once I explain, he reasons, slowing the car as they draw near.

Earlier that day he had been eating his lunch, from necessity rather than pleasure, in a newly flattened part of the old docklands and watched as three trucks from the Port Tunnel Authority had, one after another, dumped soft-core silver-grey gravel into three large mounds that left just enough room to park a car between them and the dockside.

He had watched, mesmerised, not quite believing. Was what he had really, truly, madly wished for about to happen? The perfect space obscura happened upon by accident when he had spent so much time turning upside down the fabric of the landscape in which he travelled looking for that same alchemy. Persephone’s grove, he had thought: a beginning and an end; or a test even, circles of doubt forming. A gift more like, he had decided. From whom though, he had wondered.

Patient, he had waited until the last of the trucks had rumbled off before stepping out from the car and walking – hurrying – across to inspect the space behind the mounds, checking the lines of sight as he approached. He had hesitated there, tasted the salt on his tongue and felt his hairs bristle. Sweat droplets had formed; fallen; seared like embalming fluid. Khufu, Khafre and Menkaure: Fourth dynasty, he had remembered; and him the fourth generation entombed.

Ahead, across the race of Wiltshire’s corrida, the obelisk of Poolbeg Power Station’s stack had suddenly spurted. Poolbeg, the “little water” and beyond it, south, Sandymount strand where a straddling desire for “the little death” had sandspewn because elsewhere Mrs Marion and Ares had a blazing ride to the sound of a harmonica. A curse on all your kin, he had mouthed, because he was cursed. He had looked down into the black waters that lapped against the dockside, and then at the ground. He had wanted to do it – the Idea, the Spark – there and then, in the shadows of the peaks: be Enki, consecrate this abzu of Eridu; or Hephaestus, Onan or even, Bloom. Tell Abu Shahrein, he’d remembered: telltale mounds, telling nothing.

Choking back he had returned to the car to get his phone and massage it into life. The service had flashed availability of the Grid and while waiting to connect thoughts of the Heinous Sin, Foucault’s punishment, multiple editions, multiple emissions and Yeats pleading with the knife to prolong the strife, engaged. The devekut had no such limitations. Distracting thoughts especially those with sinful intent he knew – he embraced – contained the divine Spark, which should, and could be released. Degas’ human beast going about its business, “the way a cat licks herself”. Could all disappear perhaps tomorrow, he had realised hanging on, into the yielding but sterile clay of the tunnel bed. This was his opportunity, he had reasoned, his one final opportunity to make it home. The Athene poster-girl! He needed her now, for the future; and from the past, his mother, and all the other women who held the legacy together.

Orphan stones crackle beneath the tires of the car as it negotiates the perimeter of the mounds and enters the shadow space. He switches off the headlights. Above them a dark, cloudless sky but as his eyes adjust bright stars appear and he whispers, ‘Kristallnacht.’ Ahead, close to Poolbeg’s lesser light, a small boat bobs; listening to but not talking on channel 12. To the left, port side, marking the fairway beyond the docks edge, nice navigation buoys flash their welcome and warning to Acheron. To his right, starboard side, the glow from the city rims the gravel mounds as if part of them: the poet O’Malley’s nimbus.

‘Why did you come here?’ she suddenly asks, sounding not so much afraid as uneasy.
‘The Light! Always the light.’
‘What are you on about?’
‘You asked?’
‘I meant why did you bring me here. The other girls said you were a sound client. You know what I mean . . . pleasant dinners together, good hotel rooms afterwards. Straight!’

The sky is shimmering above them. ‘Do you see Orion?’ he says, pointing upwards. ‘They say that within the nebula, just there below the belt of Ainitak, Ainilam and Mintaka, all the new galaxies of our universe are being generated. Orion’s knob, I call it. Isn’t that something?’
‘Why did you bring me here?’ she hisses.
‘May I have one of your cigarettes?’ he asks. ‘Please.’
‘What? Sure.’ She holds out the packet, watches his eyes as he accepts a light, waits while he draws deeply.
‘That’s obvious, surely,’ he says.
‘But why here – in a car of all places? This is not my scene. Not in this outfit. The agency would never have allowed for this. We’re an exclusive service. Why don’t you go back to the city and find a street hooker? They specialise in manual transmissions . . . if that’s what you want.’

He smiles, likes her sharpness. Outside the navigation buoys kept flashing, less obvious now through the fog of their breaths, and elsewhere in the city, he knew, boys navigated: flashing, docking, ducking, diving. ‘We are here, you and I, to consummate our future . . . and our past,’ he says exhaling the menthol smoke.
‘Like hell we are,’ she says straightening the expensive black cocktail dress.
‘Relax will you. I’m not going to force you into anything you don’t want to do. Hear me out.’
‘It better be good! This place gives me the creeps.’ He keeps her waiting; the slick smile unchanged. She shivers but comes to a quick decision, the only option she can think of: she moves her hand to his zip. ‘Listen James, why don’t I blow you, no charge, and you bring me back.’

Her voice is now edgy, brittle. He opens the window to let the smoke out. ‘My name is not James, he says quietly, lifting her hand from his crotch.’

The truth is everything he thinks, remembering back:

Madam,

The confluence of events unfolding as I write: the retraction of both the intent and specifics of the Freedom of Information Act; the promotion of a “morally just” war in the Middle East, with a deadline of 17 March 2003; and the same-day commemoration of the death in AD 493 of St Patrick, brings sharply into focus the enclosure of truth, the fear of truth, and mankind’s ever present facility, verisimilitude; a facility as natural as breathing, to mould destiny to reflect the dominant, determined and orchestrated orthodoxy of the day.
St Patrick was a Celestine apparatchik dispatched to stamp out Pelagianism, the doctrine of a real Irish monk. Pelagius arrived fully educated, multilingual and theologically proficient in Rome in AD 400, 33 years before Patrick’s appointment, and his doctrine denied – a doctrine first promulgated in his Commentary on St Paul, a tome which was to remain in use in Ireland for 100 years after Patrick’s death – in line with Stoic philosophy’s moral strength of man’s own free will, the dogma of “original sin” and further promoted the possibility of a “sinless” life dependant on free will alone. Imagine!
The physical nature of this “heretical” free will, was quickly approximated by Patrick’s successors, and their dominant orthodoxy, to “snakes” because of the continuing influence of Gnosticism and its orphitic veneration of the serpent as the visible presence of the Supreme Power.
And it is no different today! Why bother looking for “snakes in the grass” when the “fuzzy logic” or approximate reasoning of orthodoxy only requires a value placed on the notion that they “might be there”, for “being there” to be established as the truth; a Rumsfeldian notion of truth: “There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we know we don’t know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don’t know we don’t know”; a Pantagruelian propaganda driven by an approximate reasoning of the nature of truth – if only it were funny.
Fuzzy logic in our own Utopia has determined that some truth is inconvenient and that the Freedom of Information Act is a dangerous influence on the nature of knowing. In the propaganda of truth; in the nature of knowing; in the nature of the unknowing, there will always be “snakes in the grass”. There has to be! How else would verisimilar humans ever justify their actions?

Yours Sincerely,
James Cuddy,
L/O Albert Road,
Cork.


What do you mean it’s not your name?’ She tries to keep any annoyance from her voice. Keep cool, she thinks. ‘The escort agency has used your credit card details to pay for tonight as with all the other nights. There have been no problems with payment.’
‘I know but my name is not James as yours is not Jennifer,’ he answers matter-of-factly.
‘What do you mean?’ Shit, she thinks, reaching up to turn on the interior light. Needs to look at him. She knows she sounds suddenly afraid.
‘Jessica Cohen! That’s your name. A third year maths and philosophy student in Trinity! From Galway, I know all about you.’
‘Jesus Christ! Why? Who are you? Wh . . . what are you?’ she stammers. Who is this guy, she wonders. A stalker? Someone from home? Both? Sent by my father? Oh God, not that, she hopes.
‘Relax, will you!’ he says.
‘I’m getting out of here. Let me out of here!’ she screams.
‘You’re free to go, Jessica but it’s a long walk and not a very friendly area.’

She looks for his body language. He has big shoulders, a clean-shaven angular face – handsome in a way –, mid-40s, black hair slicked back, eye colour hard to determine. In fact his eyes seem impassive, opaque almost. Bad sign, she thinks. ‘I’ll call a taxi if you tell me exactly where we are,’ she demands fumbling in her bag, pulling out her mobile phone. His hand grabs hers, not hard or roughly. More a caution!
‘Why don’t you listen to me for a second? After that I’ll bring you back.’
‘No sex?’ she asks, disbelieving.
‘I don’t want sex, Jessica. It is much more important than that. I’d like you to participate though. That’s something you could do for me.’

Oh shit, a wanker, she thinks. I hate making up stories. ‘Just my luck,’ she says, under her breath.

They sit in silence for a while, he turns on the CD player, plays Clapton’s Pilgrim; he looks at his watch.
‘May I use your phone?’ he asks. ‘I need to text someone and mine is broken. I’ll pay.’
‘Oh! I don’t have much credit.’ Pay as you go, the agency boss had warned, more difficult to trace than an account; less chance of itemised bills creating problems. I hope the hell he is not ringing Dad, she thinks.
‘I’ll be quick,’ he says taking it from her. He texts. She leans towards him a little, sees the number is long distance. Too many digits for Galway, or even Ireland, she thinks, relieved; and then worries about the credit. He sends the message and places the mobile on the dashboard. ‘May I leave it there? I have asked him to reply to this number. It’s important.’
‘Sure,’ she says, happy it is back within reach. There is a silence again as both of them wait. It’s 4.00 a.m. Who does he expect to answer at his time? The silence gets to her. ‘How do you know my name?’ she finally asks.
‘I made it my business. It wasn’t hard. Followed you a few times.’
‘Why?’
‘Anonymity does nothing for me, I am tired of it, ’ he says, closing the window, the stench from a tide on the turn bothering him.
‘Oh,’ she mutters, surprised but not convinced. Clapton’s Going Down Slow begins and he quickly reaches out to turn off the CD. His hand brushes accidentally against her sheer-stockinged leg and she pulls it away, obviously. Pulls down the hem of her skirt as well. The retraction – rejection – annoys him and he stiffens with a grunt. The atmosphere between them changes and she wonders what she must do. ‘The other girls said you were some sort of marketing guru.’ Her tone is cautious, controlled; the words deliberate, conditioned, aiming to disarm. A chess game, a game she liked!
‘I’m a product placement specialist,’ he eventually answers.
‘I’m that myself!’ She laughs, thinly. Good girl, she thinks, making all the right sounds and moves: trained to deal with dodgy punters.
‘I like a sense of humour,’ he says.
‘What do you place?’ she asks, persisting.

What is it exactly that you do Eric?’ Cornelius Murphy, the publisher, asked, looking up from the rim of his cappuccino and then at his watch. ‘You need to be quick. I’m catching a flight to Los Angeles at 4.00 p.m. and must get moving.’
He had looked at Murphy, froth framing the publisher’s mouth, clinging like cotton flowers to the hairs of his moustache; and his baldhead, polished by the sun, reflecting the shadows of people passing by, outside the window. ‘I specialise in creating opportunities for your business by placing your company’s books in shops that have not previously ordered from you or which only deal with you occasionally. Multiply your sales to them, five-fold, ten-fold, whatever you want!’
‘And how do you do that . . . if you don’t mind me asking.’
‘Terror Con, terror,’ he had replied, waiting for the splutter that always came.
‘Jasus! What do you mean?’
‘I’m a product-terrorist, creating havoc in the machinations and machines of retailers everywhere, in your case booksellers.’
‘How?’ the publisher asked.

Cornelius Murphy was a mountain climber, he knew. He made it his business to know these things. Climbers were used to taking calculated risks. What he was showing Murphy was a mauvais pas – the foul step in mountaineering terms – which, if taken and executed well meant a climber reached the summit, but if taken and executed badly meant destruction.
‘Are you sure you want to know?’ he’d asked.
‘Yes! Get on with it.’
‘I take some of your books and target the biggest and busiest stores, especially those in airports. I walk in and randomly place these books in locations throughout the store, with appropriate pricing details – facing out of course.’
‘But how will that work?’
‘That’s the beauty of it, Con! It’s like a virus or ticking bomb. A week or so later I return, pretending to be a customer, pick up the book, and approach the counter. Low and behold the book is not in the system. No record. I act agitated, annoyed, surprised, in a hurry, all depending on the attitude of the person dealing with me. What does the seller do? Busy queue, people waiting, takes the money, records the bar code, and curses somebody for not doing stock control properly. Later that day or week stock control curses the system for losing the order docket, records the details of the publisher, and locks in the transaction into the payment system. They, very occasionally, reorder when they see that this was the only copy they had, but that is a bonus.
Success of retail terrorism depends on the chaos in large retailers, the opportunities for mistakes to be made. You Con, on the other hand, are patient! You wait. Eventually a payment comes for that single book. You respond giving the titles of the other books I have placed in the store, but exaggerate the numbers by a factor of five or ten. Have an invoice ready. Demand payment for these. They check. Find some of those books eventually, but only one of each. Four or nine unaccounted for, whatever you have decided upon. Must have been sold, but not recorded, a glitch in their systems at the beginning. You have undermined that system, planted the seeds of doubt, created terror. You get irate, but accept their apologies – and payment – and milk that contrition for future orders. Are you following all this?’
‘Jasus!’
Cornelius Murphy’s face told him that the climber knew that he was already trapped; he had taken the step, moved into the shadows of fate.


What do you place?’ she asks again.
‘What? Oh! Anything really, any thing! Books are my speciality though,’ he replies before turning to her. ‘Are you still frightened of me . . . of the situation?’
‘You said earlier that your name is not James. What is it so?’
‘Eric Bloom,’ he replies looking at Orion. ‘Eric Paula Bloom to be exact.’
‘Bloom . . . like in Ulysses?’ she asks.
‘Exactly like in Ulysses! I’m the great, great-grandson of Leopold Bloom.’
Oh shit! she thinks. ‘Come off it, will you,’ she laughs. ‘He was . . . is a fictional character. How could you be his relative?’
‘I am, although more accurately, I’m Bloom’s mamzer: Milly’s mamzer.’
‘A what?’
He’d often tried imaging how Milly might have told him:

Dearest P,
I have been fearful of writing, fearful of what you might think of me, your silly milly. And as I think everything of you this causes great disturbance. The August Bank Holiday weekend together was swimming, and wonderful and lovely – like it was before. Mr C accepted my excuses that you had taken ill and that I thought it better to nurse you in the Greville Arms until you left on the last train, unable to call on him. But that is the rub. The reason I fetched up in Mullingar, I think, when I think kindly of you, which is often, was to avoid discovery by mummy or anyone else. But that plan, I fear, has become unstuck. We are discovered, not by anyone else, but by me, silly me. I am late, two months almost. I kept hoping but do not know what to do. Sick almost every day. Mrs is suspicious, keeps butting in when Bannon, the student I told you about, comes close. What am I to do? What are we to do?
Come soon.
Forever my fondest –

Tell me,’ she interrupts.
‘“Milly too. Young kisses: the first. Far away now past”, ’ he mutters, annoyed somewhat.
‘If you don’t tell me what you are ranting on about, James . . . Eric, I swear to god I’ll swing at you, and run. I’ll take my chances,’ she replies half-opening the door. The sea is directly below her, a long way down: lapping, sucking. He has parked right on the edge. Right over the edge almost! She closes the door again.
‘Milly Bloom got pregnant,’ he continues.
‘How do you know?’ she asks, deciding to play along.
‘I make it my business to know . . . like knowing all about you. I search, delve, turn over, burrow, tunnel, keep going until I know, or there is nothing left to know. In search of the truth.’
‘Why?’ she asks.
He seems not to hear her, is lost in thought.
‘What happened?’ she asks, exhaling smoke against the window from a newly lit cigarette, deciding to play along. ‘Was there a child?’ The smoke clings to where she has traced her initials, JC, on the thermoclined glass.
He nods, gravely. ‘Born in a nursing home in Golder’s Green, London on May 9, 1905, the night of the gathering of the ancestors, to one Millicent Virag, a photographer’s assistant from Dublin, a boy. Father unknown. Dr Silverman in attendance. Complications. Puerperal fever. Died 5.00 a.m., 16 May 1905. The child, named Rudolph, given up for adoption at behest of one Leopold Bloom, girl’s father.’
‘Oh!’ she says, in decrescendo.

He likes her stunting of the word, its restraint from any complicity, any enthusiasm, as if reminding herself he might be crazy. He smiles and continues, ‘His past, eastwards, as best I can establish, is father Leopold Bloom of Eccles Street, Dublin; grandfather Rudolf Virag of Szombathely, Vienna, Pest, Milan, London, Dublin and Ennis; great-grandfather Leopold Virag of Szesfehervar and Satu Mare, who once met Maria Theresa, the empress, in the company of one Baron Frank of Offenbach, and who was born in 1750 in Kuty in the Bukovina district of the Hapsburg Empire to an Eve Samuel, daughter of Besht disciple Israel Samuel of Polonnoye, and a Zevi Virag of Mezhirech. Are you following me?’ he asks.
‘Oh sure!’ she responds.
‘His future, westwards: as Rudolf Inkerman, adopted son of Adolph Inkerman, printer. Also a printer! Married in London, 1925, to a Miss Jane Sweeney. Two children. The first a boy, Stephen Inkerman, born in 1927, died from tuberculosis in 1942. The second, Holly Inkerman, born 1930, married a Dr Stanislaus Cuddy of Limerick 1952. They had one child, James, born in Limerick 1953. Resident of Albert Road, Cork. Changed his name by deed poll to Eric Paula Bloom, 28 August 2003 on Augustine’s day. Still a mamzer!’
‘A what?’
‘A special kind of bastard! Jewish law: Deuteronomy 23:2: the bastard issue – alien, mongrel – of incest or adultery shall not enter the assembly of Yahweh even to the tenth generation. Can be a king but never a witness. A mamzer!’
‘What’s that got to do with me?’
‘Don’t you see?’
‘See what?’
‘That –’ The mobile phone sitting on the dashboard vibrates with a sharp thrill. ‘ – excuse me,’ he adds, reaching for it. He waits for the message to open and reads: F off with ur pln. Don’t contact again or I report u to SPI or pol! CM. ‘Shit!’ he barks, opening the window and throwing the phone out.
There is a splintering crash.
‘What did you do that for?’ she screams, suddenly, deeply unnerved again.
‘Gobshite, no bloody spirit! I showed Murphy the way and he has rejected it. Blinkered fool!’
‘I don’t pretend to know what’s bothering you James . . . Eric, but it’s very late to be calling,’ she says appeasingly.
‘You’re dead right there,’ he replies with venom. He senses her withdraw even further; her breathing becoming faster. He regrets, relaxes, placates, ‘I’m sorry about your phone, Jessica. I over-reacted. I’ll replace it of course. It’s just a business problem . . . a publisher I’m doing some work for. He was texting from the States. Behind in time.’
A mauvais pas, he thinks. The climber has always one other option: to calculate the risk; to refuse to take the step; to leave the mountain win out but live to climb another day. But he cannot understand Murphy’s stance; and all the others; and all the unacknowledged, unpublished letters. Can they not see? Do they not know I’m zaddik and can open the way to the light? He opens the car door and steps out, needing to breathe the night air. He walks away from the car, stands at the edge of the dock, scuffles the remnants of the phone over it. There is a splash below and a small phosphorescent whirlpool forms; neiridian swirls darting this way and that.
Behind him, he suddenly hears a noise, and turns to see her jumping from the car. She starts running, slips on some of the loose stones, falls, and screams. She tries to get up, but is unable. He walks back towards her, slowly, holds his hands out. She sobs, grips her ankle, and cowers up the side of the first mound. The cock’s tail is torn along one edge. More leg shows, her lower lip jibbers.
‘Leave me alone. Please leave me alone,’ she cries.
Her hands are digging into the gravel as she tries to crawl upwards. She gets so far but then slides down again. He watches her eyes widen in despair, heavenwards. Above them the stars glitter at even greater magnitude.
Errauit genetrix: plector cur filia . . . My mother err’d; I suffer!’ he whispers.
‘Oh God! Stay away from me,’ she screams.
He looks back down at her, waits for a moment; waits for her to draw breath; keeps his own breathing even.
‘Lekah Dodi,’ he begins but then stops. ‘I have no intention of hurting you, Jessica. None whatsoever,’ he says keeping a distance.
‘What do you want so?’ she whimpers, not believing.
‘I have two choices,’ he says.
‘What?’
‘To break the mamzer’s curse!’

She is puzzled, shakes her head, rubs her ankle, sobs.
‘I could, for example, marry a gentile and that person then converts to Judaism. With her I can then re-enter the assembly and my children would no longer be mam –’
‘You want me to marry you?’ she laughs, sarcastically.
‘No. There is another way. I will return to the earth, begin again at the beginning. Wipe out the memory by creating a new one. I need you to witness that return.’
‘But I’m not Jewish,’ she says.
‘You were once! You are a Cohen, a kohein, one of the priests of Aaron. It is your legacy, your responsibility. I have carefully chosen you for this. You are the flower to my bloom, the moisture, the chaste.’
‘I’m hardly that,’ she says, pulling the edges of her skirt together.
‘Not in my mind,’ he says.
‘But –’
‘No “buts” Jessica, my philosopher. Remember your Kierkegaard. The merest hint of a “but” and the beginning has already gone wrong.’

He turns away from her, traces a circle on the ground with his toe, unbuckles his belt, drops down his trousers and briefs and begins to stroke. Slow at first then faster and faster, tightening and relaxing the grip of his fingers. It does not take very long to reach the moment; with the Lights of Chanukah surrounding him, 5764 years since the Era began: at 9 hours and 27 minims to be exact; and in 5/114 of a second, his first show, almost without effort. He has been preparing for it. The nimbus glows brighter around the mounds and the lights on the water pulse. His back arches trusting his pelvis forward as the spasms begin and wave upwards. The start arcs, the remainder dribbles. He buckles forward; directs it towards the earth; lands on his knees....

He stays there for some time, feels the light go out and then on again. Leans back on his ankles. Looks up at the crystal sky, to the northwest where Cepheus and Cassiopeia glimmer-smile; and he, almost central in the golden shower that crosses the night.

‘Arise Erichthonius, and honour thy mother and the light,’ he says eventually, quietly. He gets up off his knees, pulls up the trousers and begins to carefully pile stones from the mounds into a smaller heap within the circle. Satisfied with his handiwork, he paces around the homunculus clockwise reciting the learnt words. Stops after each circuit, stoops, traces a letter with his finger. Five times he does this then signs off. He turns to look at her, catches her suppressing a smirk.
‘Is that it?’ she asks, incredulous, getting to her feet.
‘Just about! I nearly forgot.’ He returns to the mound, flattens it and from the centre takes a fistful of soil and gravel. He holds out his hand to show it to her. She looks away in disgust. He shrugs and places the fistful in his pocket.
‘What happens now?’ she asks.
‘Let’s get you to casualty and have that ankle seen to.’

They arrive in the waiting area of the Accident and Emergency Department. It’s 5.30 a.m. and the mixed aroma of hormones and vomit greets them – the scent of product placement in Dublin. After booking her in he finds a seat and waits amongst the detritus of the night, enveloped deep within the despair that covers them like a cloak. A drunk beside him is playing guitar on the hairs of his bared chest, digging him with his elbow to join in.

Diddllyeeeee –eyyyy – oooo, diddllyeeeee –eyyyy – aaaa. . .

It is almost an hour later when she reappears, on crutches, a nurse alongside. He stands up, approaches her, and waits for the nurse to leave them alone together.
‘What’s the news?’ he asks.
‘I’ve a hairline fracture on my right ankle, all because you wanted to jerk yourself off. Light my arse . . . it’ll go on your bloody bill. Be sure of that,’ she whispers. ‘And look at the state of my dress and shoes. Ruined!’
‘I’m sorry,’ he says.
‘Just leave me alone,’ she groans tiredly.
‘Please –’
‘Get lost!’ she rasps and turns away.
‘Right,’ he says and heads for the exit. Its guillotine doors pull back, hover and begin to close. He hesitates beneath the canopy, hoping. Then it comes. She is shouting his name.
‘Eric! Eric!’

He turns, happy, smiles in her direction, waves. Her image is briefly distorted by glass as the bleary-eyed doors half-close. They open again and he strides towards her.
She looks directly at him; her ice-blue eyes stop him in his tracks. She screams across the room. ‘What did you call yourself? A mamzer! That’s about right. And something else, you bastard! You’ve a . . .’ she hesitates.

The eyelids of the addicts, drunks and battered women in the waiting area instantly flicker open. Dead eyes shift from her to him and back again.

‘What?’ he asks.

Their audience of misery inhale as one; a coven anticipation of an ending, an ending they perhaps wish for themselves.

You have a really small –’ she screams.

He misses the last word, but imagines.

Diddllyeeeee –eyyyy – oooo,’ the hair strumming drunk suddenly sings out at the top of his voice, drowning out hers.

First published in Absinthe – New European Writing ©R.Derham