A Referee's Rant

Recently a GAA referee called Willie Barrett was attacked by a fan while officiating at a hurling match in Tipperary. The incident was captured on a mobile phone and now is available on youtube.

(http://www.youtube.com/user/TheHurlingman)

Increasing violence directed towards referees both on and off the pitch has been a feature of soccer in particular but also Gaelic and increasingly rugby union.

In August 2002 South Africa's Tri-Nations clash with New Zealand in Durban was thrown into chaos when a fan attacked the referee.The two sides were locked at 17-17 early in the second half when a fan wearing a Springbok shirt ran on to the field and tackled Irish referee David McHugh.

The fan - 46-year-old Pieter van Zyl - was escorted off the field by stewards but McHugh was taken off in a motorised cart clutching his shoulder and was unable to continue.

As a former referee I felt very strongly that not enough was done to protect referees from players or spectators by way of sanction and this led to considerable frustration. The following letter is one I penned to the President of a Dublin rugby club following a match I officiated in 2004. It is long winded and I never received either a reply or an apology, which says something about the how the sport itself was been run at the time. Thankfully at senior level there have been significant improvements in the behaviour, thanks in the main to video and television, and also to the facility afforded clubs and officialdom to conduct a ‘post-match’ citing if technology has picked up on serious incidents. There still are significant concerns for the way the game is coached at a junior level however and like soccer encouraging teams to continuously question the referee is a terrible precedent.

I have deleted the name of the club involved lest even at this remove I be accused of slander or libel.

31 October 2004

xxxx xxxxx Esq.,
President,
A Rugby Football Club,
Dublin.

Dear Mr xxxxx,

From the outset I would like to emphasise that I am writing to you from an entirely personal standpoint. I am not sure why I feel so strongly, feel so driven to do so but do so I must.

I had the pleasure on Saturday, 30th October, and I mean this sincerely, of officiating at the Connemara v ‘A Rugby Football Club’ AIL fixture in Clifden. The match had the intensity, tribal rivalry almost, normally associated with an inter-parish, or inter-town match but, of course, played with a level of skill, fitness and tactical nous of players who take their rugby very seriously indeed. That said, there are a number of concerns, which I feel warrant an airing, if only by way of expressing a perspective which perhaps is at odds with others but also, sadly, recognising that in the very volition of raising them will perhaps create misunderstanding as to any agendas that I might have. There are none!

I fully understand the pressures of organising, financing and encouraging a club with the history and aspirations that ‘A Rugby FC’ have (my brother Paul, is director of rugby in Cork Con) and there are people like you (and him) who have put in far more time and effort than I have been able to, who deserve the real credit for sustaining the game in very difficult economic circumstances.

However, I do feel that this determination, this desire to survive, to succeed, must not be to the detriment of what it truly means to participate or indeed, to have the grace to win and lose in equal measure. This is perhaps far too aspirational. Sport has long become what war once was, what war can still be. Humanity has always been innately violent, whether genetically programmed or as a response to external pressures is debatable, and the hope that sport would be a catalyst for a dampening of these tendencies is tenuous at best. In ancient times the Sa-Gaz (literally ‘head-smashers’) mercenaries employed by the Sumerians undertook for pay, the violent duties declined by the city dwellers of the first ‘civilisations’ and the meaning of their lives, literally their lives, depended on their ability to win or lose. In the modern rugby era a similar demand to succeed has meant succumbing to the criteria laid down by the value system, both playing and coaching alike, of the professional mercenary ‘rugbiest’. As with all mercenary endeavours however those values, those codes of conduct of the mercenary – or lack of thereof - are alien, imported, accepted, sanctioned, by the employing authorities because somehow these authorities believe that to defend themselves, to conquer their ‘enemies’, these values are necessary, their alien nature creating confusion, fear in the ‘enemy’. Both employers and mercenary alike recognise the transient and dispensable nature of this relationship and in equal measure dispense with the formalities of civility in pursuit of conquering, winning or ‘glory’.

This was particularly evident during the AIL match. If a ‘fear of losing’ at all costs comes to dominate the game, and that fear is mutated to a blame placed at another person’s door then we have all failed. If, at club level, violence is sanctioned as a virtue, or thuggery given tacit approval, or malice intended with prejudice condoned, then ‘winning’ a game, any game, is pointless, regardless of the legacy, the desire, the determination of any club. My primary responsibility as an official is to uphold the Laws of the game, but more importantly my primary duty is to ensure that these mercenary value systems, this so–called acceptable behaviour – understandable, necessary, coached, whatever – and conduct does not result in injury to other players; a responsibility that I refuse to apologise for.

One simple example of this attitude was when one of your players, sin-binned for dangerous play, was refused re-entry to the field because 10 minutes of ‘playing time’ had not elapsed. In games where there is not an automatic clock controlled by the referee then the assistant referee must take into account any injury time that has elapsed during the period of the ‘sin-binning’ in order that the full sanction intended by the notion of ‘sin-binning’ is enforced. The player failed to understand this instruction and proceeded in front of supporters, adult men, women and children, to loudly call me a ‘cunt’. Leaving aside my understandable distaste, given my profession, of the derogatory and demeaning word used so publicly and loudly I also felt that the use of language was unnecessary and puerile. At another point I had to remonstrate with the coaching staff to tone down their foul and abusive language from the sidelines, because they were in full hearing of all people attending.

Let not this ‘foul language’ commentary be misunderstood. In another life I am a published novelist, and publisher, and employ the use of colloquial language to effect but always with a care to who the writing is aimed at. It is more that the notion of standards, a sense of where they were at, of what example they are setting is completely discarded -under the mercenary value system of players and coaching staff - in this era of ‘winning at all costs’. I don’t suppose many people share this level of indignation, this reflection on a greater danger, but I do. We have long seen the effect of ‘anarchy of conduct’ in soccer and increasingly, in Gaelic football, and I feel the fight to hold onto what we have in rugby football, is worth that fight.

One final reflection: Following the match, while standing outside King’s pub in Clifden, two of your players confronted me with the accusation that the only reason I was an official was that I was a ‘failed’ player and therefore an embarrassment to the game.

On the journey home this comment made me think. By what or whose criteria in rugby does a participating individual become a ‘failed’ anything? In war, in survival, the criteria are probably obvious. In sport it can only ever be an approximation but it would be naïve of me, however, if I did not acknowledge that increasingly within rugby, at playing, coaching and officiating levels, there are such criteria and by their very nature ultimately deny the beauty and belittle the ideals of participation over ‘winning’.

Do I ever consider participating as referee an act of failure, or an embarrassment to the sport, to the notions of humanity? In a small way I have, given the demands of my profession, tried to enhance and maintain participation in rugby football. I have been a referee for 26 years, since starting with the Munster Branch in 1978 and although the judgement of whether I was, am, a good official is for others to decide, like everyone I have good days and bad, but that when those days end, and, they soon will, I will be saddened. I am not a mercenary; I do not claim expenses for either local or AIL matches; but that, it seems, is not enough any more.

Did my decision to participate in refereeing, while Hon Sec of UCC RFC all those years ago, while also playing for the University soccer team, to a Munster Branch request for somebody (anybody!) from the University club to be a referee forever render me a ‘failure’, forever engender in the game my participation a source of embarrassment? Perhaps it did but if personal satisfaction and enjoyment is a by-product of that ‘failure’ then yes, I have failed, and failed gloriously.

For what it’s worth from this ‘failure’ in the game I felt it necessary to reflect on something beyond myself, beyond my understanding. There is, I feel, an atmosphere, a condition, a malaise even, within the ‘A Rugby FC’s’ camp, which will, unless addressed, in the end negate enjoyment, stunt participation and ultimately leave a tainted legacy, albeit perhaps a victory.

Who really cares?

With best wishes,

Roger Derham.

c.c. xxxx xx xxxxxx, Coaching Co-ordinator.

Tehran – The New Metaphysicians of Tlön

<

Destroyed Building in a Wadi of the

Hadramaut, Yemen

Somewhere in the 4th Century of the common era the Kingdom of Ubar, a kingdom which had existed from about 2000 BCE and occupied an area of territory approximating the land either side of the current Yemen-Oman border from the coast at Nisthtun to the Rub al-Khali and which controlled much of the frankincense trade at its origins, was destroyed in a tremendous catastrophe.

The people who suffered this destruction were the ‘Ad people and their chief city was called Iram, or the ‘place of the pillars’. The memory of Iram’s destruction in the folklore of Arabia remained very strong and 250 years later when the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) revealed the Qur'an the figure of the Prophet Hud (PBUH) was to feature very strongly. Hud, the warner, was sent back to try and get his own people, the ‘Ad, to mend their ways or suffer the consequences. They did not and their beautiful and rich city of Iram was destroyed, for ever.

“And the ‘Ãd, they were destroyed by a furious wind,

exceedingly violent . . .”

Qur’an surat al-hãqqah (The Catastrophe); 69, v. 6

In the Qur'an the catastrophe was said to be a desert storm that swallowed up the city, however it is most likely that a tremendous earthquake was primary agent, as evidence from excavations on Iram show that it collapsed inwards rather than have been buried by sand.

(http://www.islamicity.com/Science/QuranAndScience/destruction/)

And so to today!

Due to increasing internal and external pressures being exerted on the political entity that is the Islamic Republic of Iran I get an overwhelming sense that the Iranian people, caught within this ‘powder keg’, are being manipulated even further. Recently, to heap further misery upon them, a cynical medieval religious fermentation of an apocalyptic vision of impending doom in Iran is being exercised. In an extension of the Qur’anic Prophet Hud allegory Ayatollah Aziz Khoshvaqt, one of Iran’s senior clerics, has warned Tehrani’s that their overt vices are inviting disaster and that a God sent earthquake is imminent and is coming to destroy them,

"Go on the streets and repent for your sins. A holy torment is upon us. Leave town."

Yet another cleric, Hojatoleslam Kazem Sedighi has also warped this message and almost imitating another Qur’anic (and Biblical) revelation about the Prophet Lut and the city of Sodom,

“(We also sent) Lut (as a messenger): behold, He said to his people, "Do ye do what is shameful though ye see (its iniquity)? Would ye really approach men in your lusts rather than women? Nay, ye are a people (grossly) ignorant! But his people gave no other answer but this: they said, "Drive out the followers of Lut from your city: these are indeed men who want to be clean and pure!" But We saved him and his family, except his wife; her We destined to be of those who lagged behind. And We rained down on them a shower (of brimstone): and evil was the shower on those who were admonished (but heeded not)!”

Qur'an 27:54-58

has declared that “Women who do not dress modestly lead young men astray, corrupt their chastity and spread adultery in society, which increases earthquakes.”

What a disgraceful ignorance! If the earth moves for you you must be sinning!

Jorge Luis Borges summed up the shallowness of this untruthful type of base approach in Ficciones when he wrote:

“The metaphysicians of Tlön are not looking for truth, nor even for

an approximation of it; they are after a kind of amazement.”

A Tremor in the Suburbs of Tehran

The Truth!

Tehran, like San Francisco or Istanbul, is in close proximity to major seismic fault lines and a significant earthquake occurring is not a matter of whether it will happen but when. It is not a question of modesty or chastity but tectonic movement. The problem facing Tehrani's is not immodesty but the density of population (13,000,000 in the metro area) and the quality of construction. The earthquake in Bam, Iran in 2003 killed 27,000 of its 43,000 official inhabitants. Over the years since then much thought has been given to moving the capital because of the risks of an even more serious disaster. The table below gives a list of some of the earthquakes that have affected the Tehran area over the last 3000 years:

The most recent earthquake recorded in Iran was in Northeastern Iran 
on Monday, April 19, 2010 at 03:31:14 UTC 325 miles ENE of Teheran and measured 4.5 on the Richter scale of magnitude.

(http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/last_event/world_iran.html)

A few years ago when visiting the Hadramaut in Yemen in pursuit of my Frankincense trail from Socotra to Petra I got as far as Tarim at the eastern end and wanted to visit the tomb of the Prophet Hud (PBUH) which exists in a narrow valley about four hours drive towards Oman. Unfortunately we were unable to make it (drivers were not keen on bringing non-Muslims there) and it is something I would like to do in the future as well as travelling to the site of Iram in Oman. It holds a peculiar fascination and the following is a poem I wrote about seven years ago for inclusion in my novel Windsong – The Breath of Being:

The Pillars of Ubar

Into the empty quarter:

Rub-al Khali,

Empty, pitiless.

Cleansed

Red-eyed tracks

Travelling amongst the fortunate people,

To Shabwah

And beyond.

And the three-cornered light awakening

So strong as to take your breath away

With Afiah b. Nasr al-Shabatini:

The last of the Uzza,

Morning star, sacrificed.

Moving, mounting

Searching

Following the scent of precious trees,

To the pillars of Ubar

And beyond.

And the three-cornered light awakening

So strong as to take your breath away

There follows:

A khamson wind,

With Hud, the warner.

To swallow, drown

In seas of silica silence

All the people of ‘Ad,

In Atlantis,

And beyond.

And the three-cornered light awakening

So strong as to take your breath away

Blazon

CASATS

Children and Adolescents Sexual Assault Treatment Service

The forensic aspect of my professional life involves the assessment of children and adolescents who are the victims or alleged victims of sexual abuse. The incidence of acute presentations is thankfully small and the majority of our work involves the examination of ‘cold’ or historic cases where the alleged episode or episodes of abuse come to light at some time from their occurrence.

Ireland signed the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1990 and ratified it in 1992 and in both its initial report (UN Doc:CRC/C/11/Add.12, 17/06/96; Para 274) and second report (UN Doc:CRC/C/IRL/2, 20/09/06; Para 475) to the Committee on the Rights of the Child stated that ‘Special units for the investigation and management of alleged child sexual abuse are in operation in the major centres of population around the country. Each health board has services in place for the treatment and support of victims of child abuse, some of which are hospital-based while others are provided at community level.’

Unfortunately this is a misrepresentation of the true facts and over the last few years two colleagues and I have been trying desperately to establish such a special unit for children and adolescents (CASATS) to based in Galway and to serve the population of the West and Mid-West of Ireland. Our proposal has hit a wall however ( as it must be admitted many proposals have in these days of Ireland’s economic implosion) somewhere in the Health Service Executive labyrinth. The Department of Justice were not rushing into help either.

Last week my frustration with the whole process boiled over and I lodged a formal complaint with the Ombudsman for Children, asking her to investigate the matter.

While formulating the letter to her office my brain began to, as it is wont to, slide to peripheral aspects. Perhaps our proposal is not making enough of a visual impact I thought? Perhaps we need to present a more formalised image of what we are about? An image that would project a vision of permanence, of ongoing activity, of intent!

A Call to Arms!

From the cartouches of ancient Egypt to the shields of medieval knights I have always been fascinated by the construct, seeming permanence and visual history of these physical marks of identification, of remembrance of people long dead. There was nothing else for it! I would design a coat of arms for our unit and try to get it patented. It would be our calling card… and our memorial.

Complete vanity of course!

Instead of ranting in a corner it seemed a relatively harmless way of distraction from my frustration with the ‘new’ commissars of Irish health care. However what I was not prepared for was the incredibly arcane world into which I was venturing.

Heraldry

Heraldry as we currently understand it began with the presentation of a shield with six golden lions by Henry I of England (a Norman) to Geoffrey of Anjou, his future son-in-law, on Geoffrey’s attainment of knighthood in 1127. This became Geoffrey’s distinctive insignia and was retained by his descendents, the House of Plantagenet.

(As an aside, from Ireland’s perspective, the Angevians or Plantagenet, although related through the Empress Matilda, the grand-daughter of William the Conqueror, to the Normans were no great lovers of them and Henry II, the first Plantagenet King of England, was probably delighted with the opportunity to rid his court of any number of unruly Norman barons when he directed them to assist Diarmit Mac Murchada regain control of his Kingdom of Leinster in 1166.)

After 1135 the granting of a coat of arms rapidly evolved and developed into a science (albeit a very eccentric one) with very specific rules for construction and description of the arms. The control or patent of arms came into the hands (Heralds) of a few select individuals. It became then and remains today very big business. Arms were granted – for a consideration – to noble, commoner and corporate entities such as guilds or towns, and one has only to walk down some of the big shopping malls of this world to encounter a genealogical/heraldic concession plying its trade.

The Blazon

The blazon is the description of the coat of arms, which theoretically allows anybody to reconstruct the arms. The language of heraldry and its blazoning remains rooted in the medieval French of the Normans and Plantagenet.

I will attempt to blazon the arms that I designed as I understand the rules and then briefly explain what it means.

Arms:

Argent, a lymphad sails furled Or, on waves of sea in base azure; overall in fess an escutcheon bordered Or, a lion rampant Or langued gules; overall in nombril a windrose gules and argent.

Crest:

On a wreath of Or and gules a phoenix sable with embers gules.

Supporters:

On dexter Asclepius guardant gules and on sinister Themis guardant gules with scales Or

Motto:

Veritas praevalebit ‘Truth will win out’

Helm closed chief azure mantled azure, doubled gules.

The arms is primarily an incorporation of the arms of Galway city with a superimposed windrose. Galway is chosen because of our location. The Galway arms has a galley known as a lymphad and it is customary to mention in a blazon whether the sails or furled or unfurled. The starting point in the description is the primary colour. In this case it is the metal tincture argent or white. The ship is primarily yellow or Or. When looking at an arms depiction the left as you look is dexter (the right of the shield) and right is sinister (the left of the shield). By convention all depicted galleys are presumed to sail towards the dexter side and thus the direction is not mentioned unless it is different. The bottom of the shield is the base and the top margin the chief. In this case the sea is in the bottom and is blue or azure.

Superimposed on the galley is a smaller shield or escutcheon with a yellow border and a lion rampant with a red (gules) tongue. The position is known as the fess point or centre point of the shield. This is known as a charge and in a charge all rampant lions (erect with claws bared) are presumed to face the dexter side. If the lion is looking out it requires a rampant guardant description or if looking back over its shoulder towards the sinister side it is described as rampant reguardant.

Superimposed again is a windrose at the nombril or naval point of the shield. The windrose is allusive indicating that patients from all points of the compass may be seen, and a reminder for the service to be prepared for whatever the ‘wind’ brings from any direction.

Again, as I understand it, the crest is always included in the blazon of the arms but not the other features surrounding the shield. In this case the crest is of the phoenix rising from the ashes from a torse or wreath and allusive to our aspiration that if our work is done well then the victims are at the start of a renewal in their lives. Again by convention the phoenix is assumed to be a half-bird depiction and this does not need to be specified. I have mentioned the red colour of the flames but am uncertain whether this is done or not.

The supporters are Aesclepius the Greek God of Medicine and Themis the Greek Goddess of Good Counsel and she carries the scales of justice. In an unusual depiction for supporters they are looking outwards and are thus described guardant. In Aesclepius’s right hand is the Rod of Aesclepius with it must be noted the single entwined snake. There is often confused with the Caduceus which is the messengers staff of Iris and Hermes and which has two snakes entwined. The caduceus would be an appropriate symbol for the blazon.

The helm is the helmet on the top and is of the closed type which is appropriate I understand for a civil entity. Again always assumed to be facing dexter unless otherwise which is then described. The mantle or cape is a decorative feature and has a front and a lining (the double) and these are in different colurs.

I have probably bored you to tears with this description but it is an area that I have only scratched the surface of. Anyway design done I logged on to the Chief Herald’s Office in Dublin to determine at what cost I could get this done and patented. The medieval office is now part of the Genealogical division of the National Library and it appears to be in turmoil. The last Herald has retired and there is no replacement as yet. There also appears from the links in the Wikipedia entry to have been significant problems in the work of the office over the past few years and whether it will survive is not certain. The difficulty for taking another approach such as registering the design as a trademark with the Irish Patent Office instead is that its appearance is so similar to hundreds of thousands of other Irish, British and European coats of arms is that the Patent office is unlikely to grant exclusivity.

Thus in the unreal world of heraldry we have already become ghosts. Self-defeating really!

Here endeth the blazon.

Indigo-Blues

Jack, the last of his Christmas cigars in hand, reaches up to touch the skylight window. He ponders on the dead space between its layers... and the insulation of life in general. The Danish glassmaker’s trademark is etched high in one corner and after sucking hard on the cigar he blows a blue smoke-ring in that direction. In the background Coltrane plays. Exhalation music, he thinks.

Outside the window, towards the end of a brittle-clear January day, a twilight haze, the colour of indigo-blue, has precipitated. The colour of frozen skin, barely alive, he thinks, remembering the touch of her cheek when they first met at a New Year’s party; twenty years ago today he remembers.

She had asked him some time later, ‘What is it you really want from me, Jack?’

Nose against the cold glass he thought back to the first time they had slept together… stayed together. Sometime in the night he had woken up. He could still smell the scent of her yet knew she was already gone. Like a death her side of the bed was already cold, and his true sense of her had evaporated. He had lifted himself up on one elbow and scanned the room. She was standing in the doorway, in silhouette, naked with her long and ever so sensuous back to him, her right shoulder leaning against the frame and left leg stretched out like a ballerina, tracing imaginary shapes on the floor with her toes. On many occasions since then he wondered why she had stayed with him.

‘In my dreams, I dream only of you!’ He had replied; the words back then, so quietly said, had been barely a thrill of his lips. Dreams are but insulation between the layers of rational and irrational thought, he thinks. And he had many, he remembers. He traces her name in the condensation his breath had made with his finger.

‘Jack! Where are you?’ a voice calls.

‘Up here,’ he answers, rubbing out the name on the glass. ‘Looking at the sky.’

‘It’s a nice sky,’ she says as she climbed the retractable stairs and stood beside him.

‘Woad, the colour of despondency,’ he says.

‘What?’ she asks, pulling away a little to look at him.

‘I was imagining Viking longboats sailing up the inlet out of the haze and the purple or indigo-blue woad pigment that would have covered the warriors’ skin. The last colour many people saw before being rendered by savagery.’

‘Just the men, Jack! Many women would have survived,’ she laughed, touching him gently on the face.

‘Yeah,’ he laughs back. ‘But only the seeded ones.’

There is an awkward silence. She breaks it.

‘How are things today?’ she asks quietly.

‘A bit better,’ he replies, a bit too defensively. ‘It no longer feels like a hot poker up my ass,’ he adds, willing the radioactive iodine-blue seeds planted deep in his prostate well in their work. They had switched to twin beds for the time being. He did not want to contaminate her, not sure if he would or could inseminate…again.

‘Good,’ she says. ‘Your dinner is ready. Come on down.’

And she was gone...into the haze.

A Man Thing

About 1 in 7 Irish men in their lifetime will develop prostate cancer. It has a greater incidence than female breast cancer yet no national screening programme or management protocol exists. This is by in large the fault of men. Instead of fighting for an equivalent status to breast cancer services they have backed off, embarrassed, afraid, introspective. Accurate screening is available, in a relatively low cost base combination of PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) and prostate ultrasound. Treatment modalities and protocols including the implantation of either radioactive palladium or iodine seeds in appropriate cases has markedly reduced morbidity and mortality associated with the cancer.

We men need to become far more vocal and proactive in demanding an integrated national program.

Further Information:

F.J. Drummond, A.E. Carsin, L.Sharp, H. Comber. Trends in prostate specific antigen testing in Ireland: Lessons from a country without guidelines.

Ir J Med Sci (2010) 179;43-49

Gnomons, Exonyms and air rage

Al Idrisi World Map (Early 12th Cent, Sicily)

Detail of Arabian Pennisula

While travelling back from Australia recently with Etihad Airways I took the opportunity to stop off in Dubai for three days. The United Arab Emirates, and the Emirate of Dubai specifically, were not places I had been to before in my middle-eastern travels and I was genuinely quite curious to experience this modern version of an El Dorado (or perhaps Al Dorado to be culturally sensitive!).

Given the recent property implosion in Dubai the sequence of finished and unfinished, occupied and unoccupied skyscrapers stretching from the Creek at Deira to New Dubai has an uneasy resemblance to a House of Cards that in time will topple in the wind and be swallowed up by the desert sands. But in the meantime what cards they are! Architects have been given the license to push the parameters of steel, concrete and glass to the very edge of their envelopes.

Interior of Burj al Arab

Two memories stand out in particular. The Burj Khalifa tower is quite fantastic. The first night I was there the world’s tallest building stretched towards the three-quarter moon above like a celestial bridge. So alien and yet so belonging! During sunlight hours on the other hand it is a gnomon to the Dubai day. I could not keep my eyes off it even when the synchronized fountain display in the plaza in front of the tower was spurting in all its splendour.

The Burj Khalifa

The second building that amazed was the iconic Burj al Arab. Staring up at the blue, green and golden balcony folds of the interior atrium from the lobby floor was mesmerizing. For me it bore an uncanny resemblance to the roof of the Sultan’s private chambers in the (almost!) incomparable Yesil Cami or Green Mosque in Bursa in Turkey; its blueness, the glittering gold paint, the arabesques and muqarnas vaulting.

Both are places where you just want to lie down flat on your back and look up at the stars. Like a desert night. Quite wonderful.

Anyway to Exonyms and air rage! 

While wandering around the atrium of the Burj al Arab I picked up an English version of the Gulf News newspaper and was immediately struck by an article describing Iran’s demand that any airline flying in Iranian airspace must refer to the body of water between Iran and Arabia as the Persian Gulf. Failure to do so would result in exclusion from their airspace. Reading on I was then appraised of the intensity of feeling over what this body of water is called, a row that continues to simmer. The Arab countries since about 1950 have referred to it as the Arabian Gulf, the BBC call it the Gulf but the Iranians insist on referring to the entire body of water in its historical cartographic attribution as the Persian Gulf.

Now I like old maps and always I have understood the Arabian Gulf to be the old name for the Red Sea (see a 1540 Honter map from my own collection below) and the body of water to the east of Arabia to be the Persian Gulf.

Ibn Khaldun (d1406 CE/808 AH) the Arab polymath (not that beloved it must be said by modern pan-Arab nationalists) called the Persian Gulf the Green Gulf in his famous work the Muqaddimah, the first book of his universal history.

The naming of any geographical territory, which is not directly under a country’s political control is known as Exonymy. I was not aware until following up on this article on getting home that the United Nations has an entire sub-organization entirely dedicated to the Standardization of Geographical names, which meets in conference every five years. Iran has been consistent in pushing the agenda that the entire body of water should continue to be known in the future as the Persian Gulf and they appear to have been successful in this as the most recent UN Secretary-General’s Report on the Oceans and Laws of the Sea maintains the Persian Gulf as a descriptive exonym. (page 32, UN Doc A/64/61/Add 1, 25 November 2009).

I know that there are concerns about global warming and the seas rising but extending the Persian Gulf to 40,000 feet seems a little bit excessive.

Air rage or umbrage? Who knows the mind of a shrimp or seagull?

Further Info:

http://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/uncsgnreports.htm

Reports of the United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names

Alphabetic Philosoup – F

Foucault’s forensic foresight freed fragile Freudian fault

from Faustian facility for fiendish fantasia.

.

.

.

.

Cenomisozoiphobia

A rare Cat indeed!

Tropical cyclone Ului is drawing ever closer to the Queensland shore and the driving, centrifugal rain is forcing me indoors and somewhat introspectively again.

Cenosilicaphobia is a fear of an empty glass and a word that caught my eye while tasting a bottle of The Cenosilicaphobic Cat Sargantino Cinsault when visiting the d'Arenberg winery in McClaren Vale, South Australia recently. Although close to Adelaide where we lived in the late '80s I had not been there before and I enjoyed the lunch we had in the attached d'Arrys Verandah restaurant.It was very enjoyable indeed.

Coming to the end of our meal a retired colleague of our host/driver-guide for the day came over to say hello. Asked how retirement was suiting him he replied, 'Great mate. Every Tuesday lunch here. What more could a person need? Life is a glass half-full.'

And this is true. Yes there is enormous luck and privilege in being able to reach retirement in good health and consider life being a glass half-full. For many it is a glass half-empty and invokes an enormous fear.

CENOMESOZOIPHOBIA

Inspired by d'Arry's cat I have (I think?) derived a new word (or two new words) to describe that fear of a life half-lived. The first is cenomesozoiphobia (ceno-empty, meso-half, zoi-life or spirit) It is one I hope never to experience, or at least in the dark moments experience it as a very temporary event before tilting the glass of being back in my favour. Equally extending the half-glass metaphor for life a little further it could also be cenomesosilicaphobia.

Crapuccino and Civil Civets

A Civet at The Lodge

Caught in a cloudburst from the leading edge of tropical cyclone Ului on Australia's Gold Coast there is a little time available to me to reflect on Australia and the changes evident since we lived here twenty years ago.

The economy unlike in Ireland and Europe is booming. Unemployment somewhere about 5.8%, house prices soaring, job vacancies across all sectors occupying oceans of newsprint and ... expensive for the visitor. The Australian dollar is strong and it reflects a vast mineral wealth and the concerted effort, twenty to thirty years ago, to swing Australia's economic orientation away from west to east.

Some things don't change however. In particular the very Australian way of using descriptive nouns.

In every day language and print but particularly within the political sphere their use falls somewhere between disdain and defammatory.

Take for example the recent visit of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to Australia.

Apart from waiting until desert during the State Banquet to gleefully announce the very recent killing "execution" of a wanted terrorist ( Australia in recent days has just passed legislation banning for ever in all terrotories capital punishment and torture) Yudhoyono brought as a present to Prime Minister Rudd (apart from the metaphorical head of the Bali bomber who had been trailed by police for sometime but 'conveniently' was only killed to coincide with the visit of SBY to Australia) a gift of rare luwak coffee.

Now kopi luwak coffee is made from the extracted beans found in the excrement of Asian civets. The political commentators could not contain themselves. Laurie Oaks however, in the best of 'keatingesque' barbs, was to announce the gift as 'A new treat at the Lodge: crapuccino!'

Brilliant! Hubris mud-slinging and froth in one mouthful.

Ah the rain has stopped. Time to move again.

Israel – Ambiguity of Reason in the Assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabouth

The Assassination of Mussolini

I thought that I would not get around to blogging for a while but with time to ‘kill’ while waiting for my plane I could not but try and respond to the Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman’s avoidance of acknowledging Mossad’s role in the assassination of the Hamas official al-Mabouth by saying Israel had a ‘policy of ambiguity’ on intelligence matters.

There is always a knee-jerk reaction from Israel when anybody criticises the workings of its’ State apparatus that any criticisim directed towards it somehow carries an anti-semitic slant or agenda and as a result all the weight of a Holocaust memory is brought to bear on that criticism. Despite this puerile reaction it must be acknowledged even by the most orthodox that not all Jews are Israeli citizens, and more importantly not all Israeli citizens, as is obvious from the State’s apartheid documents of identity, are Jews. Any criticism of Israel’s dysfunctional state is exactly that: a criticism of the State not of any particular member or branch of the family of Shem.

A policy of strategic or deliberate ambiguity has long been a policy of Israel where its nuclear weapons or intelligence and security matters have come up for discussion or debate. Israel has also had a long-term policy of political assassination and qualified those actions on the basis of ‘pre-emptive’ self-defence citing Article 51 of the United Nations Charter:

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defense shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.

Although required by the Charter it is most unlikely that Israel will be rushing to inform the Security Council as exactly what was Mossad’s role in the assassination of al-Mabouth, yet it is something they resort to when they are attacked:

Identical letters dated 1 December 2009 from the Permanent
Representative of Israel to the United Nations addressed to the
Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council


I write this letter of complaint regarding a series of attacks emanating from the
Gaza Strip which is controlled by the Hamas terrorist organization.

On 13 November 2009, a rocket was launched from the Gaza Strip, and
between 18 November 2009 and 24 November 2009 four additional rockets were
fired from the Gaza Strip. Furthermore, on 16 November 2009, two mortar shells
were fired from Gaza. All of these rockets and mortars landed in the Western Negev
region of Israel adjacent to many small cities. While such attacks intentionally target
Israeli civilians, no serious casualties or damage was sustained.

I wish to reiterate that in response to these armed attacks, and in exercise of its
inherent right to self-defence under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations,
Israel will take all necessary measures to protect its citizens from the threat of
terrorism.

I should be grateful if you would have the present letter distributed as a
document of the Security Council.


(Signed) Gabriela Shalev
Ambassador
Permanent Representative

Although a signatory of the Rome Statute of the ICC in December 2000 Israel has taken the decision not to ratify its provisions. Article 8 2.B(xi) of ICC Rome Statute under the War Crimes section declares that a war crime is the:

Killing or wounding treacherously individuals belonging to the hostile nation or army.

It is interesting that in 2000 Israel attached the following note to its’ signature on the Rome Statute:

“Nevertheless, as a democratic society, Israel has been conducting ongoing political, and academic debates concerning the ICC and its significance in the context of international law and the international community. The Court’s essentiality - as a vital means of ensuring that criminals who commit genuinely heinous crimes will be duly brought to justice, while other potential offenders of the fundamental principles of humanity and the dictates of public conscience will be properly deterred - has never seized to guide us. Israel’s signature of the Rome Statute will, therefore, enable it to morally identify with this basic idea, underlying the establishment of the Court.”

By 2002 however Israel had decided not to ratify the Statute. It said in a note to the Secretary General of the UN:

".....in connection with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted on 17 July 1998, [...] Israel does not intend to become a party to the treaty. Accordingly, Israel has no legal obligations arising from its signature on 31 December 2000. Israel requests that its intention not to become a party, as expressed in this letter, be reflected in the depositary’s status lists relating to this treaty."

This ambiguity of both purpose and intent can be best explained by the fact that since 2001 Israel has considered itself at war with Hamas and that ‘law-enforcement’ legal constraints with regard to assassinations no longer apply … if they ever did.

In 1981 Ronald Regan’s Executive Order 12333 banned all US conducted assassinations however it is obvious that in the ‘War on Terror’ many have been US sanctioned and condoned. There is equal ambiguity in the US response to al-Mabouth’s death.

In March of 2009 I visited Alamut Castle (see picture below) in Iran, the near-impregnable castle of the Federation of Assassins founded by Hassan i-Sabah in the 11th Century. The asymmetrical tactics and procedures developed by Hassan are no less evident today in the activities of Mossad.




Further Reading:

Michael L. Gross, Fighting by Other Means in the Mideast: a Critical Analysis of Israel’s
Assassination Policy. At: http://poli.haifa.ac.il/~mgross/Fighting%20by%20other%20means%20in%20the%20mideast.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashshashin

Transhumance

No one, including those individuals with just the merest aspiration to compassion and understanding, could fail to be moved by thoughts of the oxygen deprived and almost medieval death of men, women and trusting children trapped in sealed containers that arrive daily in Western Europe. What drives these refugees to this end? What force could be strong enough to uproot them from their homelands in the expectation of a better life that they would jeopardise that same life in order to attain it? What makes these particular human beings want to breathe the air of a new dawn in a different place, where they suppose the distinction between the citizen and the barbarian is irrelevant, and then have that basic right to breath denied to them by a commercial miscalculation in the purgatory of a marshalling yard in Belgium or France.

Transhumance – literally meaning ‘across the ground’ – describes the seasonal sheparding movement of animals and was learnt first by Australopithecus in places near the margins of the East African Rift Valley, like Olduvai, from the stalking and killing of migrating herds across the Serengeti. The same transhumance took Homo Erectus, and fire, out of Africa about one million years ago to eventually become the hunter-gatherer sapient artists of Palaeolithic Europe. The same transhumance ten thousand years ago brought with it, out of the Caucasus, the pottery and ritual of domestication, the origins of a Proto Indo-European language, and the dissemination of ideas with that early language ability.

The language and ideas of transhumance evolved to understand and debate the concepts of reason and duty in the conduct and care of that mobile society. It was realised very early on that illness and injury affected the weak and the strong, the wise and the stupid, the rich and the poor and the good and the evil so the duty of care could not be selective. One of our early ancestors, perhaps a victim, realized that broken bones do heal and that even if left to die on the previous season’s migration an individual might actually survive. Perhaps that same ancestor thought of the simple concept of splinting the broken limb in order that it might heal straighter and therefore with less likelihood of a survivor crippling the next seasons trek. Perhaps as well it was that same ancestor who, in his desire to survive, also realized that storage could help overcome seasonal fluctuation.

The divested potshards and undigested grains of Anatolian and Mesopotamian archaeology reflect that change. With storage came settlement, enclosure, irrigation, prosperity, proprietorship, the development of the identifying seals of that proprietorship and ultimately, in a rational sequence, writing. It was called civilization.

The new writing recorded a mythology of great journeys but the transhumance society that created that mythology was soon corralled by the sovereign proprietor’s desire to manipulate the seasons and the commerce of those seasons. The annual inundation of the Nile was monitored and anticipated. The Pharaohs entrusted chancellors, like Joseph, to stock and control the large storage grain silos that allowed those same sovereign proprietors to ride out the savage intent of seasonal disappointment. Furthermore, and deliberate in its intent to suppress a notion of seasonal freedom, the early Greek civilisers took it upon themselves to name those same Seasons, children of Zeus and Themis, as Peace, Order and Justice.

Given this new agenda and a new architecture of ritual enclosure, transhumance communities were forced to settle. These settled communities then split into the citizens, who spoke the language within, and the barbarians – literally the tongue-tied – without, who couldn’t. That distinction alone became enough of a justification for slavery. Transhumance and its reliance on memory and duty fell fowl of the new civilizations' ‘reasoned’ legislative and restrictive language of obligation.

Obligation to whom, it might be asked.

In time recollections distorted and Truth suffered. Human society, as Nietzsche pointed out, no longer saw itself as the product of a history of errors made but was in fact was the result of a mysterious secret and powerful prescription. Chaos was irrational and dangerous. The druids and the priests appropriated this ‘so-called’ secret from the wise - who knew better - and interpreted its Truth as they saw fit for the people. In time this loss of Truth, already a distant memory, was capitalised on – the term capitalists originally referred to the seasonal sheep drovers of Arles in Southern France – by those who saw profit in that loss. The barterers of the new truths became the lead members and garrison commanders of society.

Further transhumance became an embarrassment and a reflection of primitive irrational failure rather than mankind’s first great achievement. Journey’s end was usually civilization’s ghettos of segregation and isolation and what Michel Foucault determined to be the inexorable development of the all-pervasive and restrictive gridlock of our present existence and experience – the Grid. Society, and by extension society’s institutions, promoted defined spaces for individuals so that those individuals could be controlled primarily and segregated if necessary; particularly if they happened to be barbarians and did not speak the language – in the broadest sense - of their controllers.

In exploring the notion, and promotion, of segregation and isolation we have only to consider how health care, justice and information are delivered within present day society.

Health Care.

As one of the first ideas, and earliest ideal conceptions, the health care of transhumance quickly got lost in the labyrinthine language of the ghettos. Hospitals, from their earliest beginnings in the Asclepieion of Greece, to the Valetudinaria of Rome, the Xenones of Byzantium, to the bimaristans of the Umayyads, to the lazaretto and Hospitaller templates of medieval and modern monoliths, became the deliberately smug encapsulation of all that ‘progress’. They, like the values they reflect, are held up as proof positive of our evolution and are allowed to milk most of the economic applause of society. They are the gridlock par excellence.

The physicians of gagged obligation and self-interest have displaced Immanuel Kant’s metaphysicians of reason and duty. Within the grid, enormous hierarchical empowerment has the facility to both mine and countermine the ethical bedrock and the coalface of health care delivery. Within the grid, individuals, and as a former specialist I include myself in this assessment, are sometimes dazzled by their own importance, and indeed, are sometimes so encouraged in this bedazzlement that they forget what really is important. Present day health care delivery thrives on the notion of prioritisation. Sectional interests predominate and the duty of care to the transhumance barbarians, those people outside the grid, whom are everything we once all were, is ignored.

Prioritisation is the fundamental principal, and flaw, of the Grid.

Justice.

Justice fares little better. Prisons are what Hospitals are. Courts determine the priority. Despite attempts to return to the basic values of transhumance by promoting the concept of human rights and human rights legislation, most of that legislation has been defined within the constraints of the Grid where obligation transcends duty. The sovereign proprietors barter ratification of legislation.

The original language of duty applied to all humanity was a transparent intuitive language of the open ground of human interaction. The language and legislation of obligation, the language that determines our present day lives, has been defined in camera, in an enclosure safe from ‘irrational’ barbarian interpretation. It is a language demanded and expected from the judiciary, by the camerarii – the chancellors of the Grid. It is a hidden language, a perpetuation of druidic interpretation. Its bedrock is an assumed notion of having a unique understanding of the Truth and that same bedrock’s only purpose is to support the foundations of the Grid. Precedent is lauded as that Truth and its values are determined by those druids who can best manipulate the language of obligation and the compensation for that obligation. Priority is given to the ideal result rather than the ideal conception.

Precedent is not the Truth, it is a perpetuation of previous priority.

Because of this prioritisation, because of this flaw, unless there is a renewal, justice will never serve the interests of the barbarian or indeed, humanity. A new or renewed language is required.

Information.

Information dispersal and the technology of that dispersal is also a unique and fascinating aspect of modern day life. The Internet, originally threatening to the camerarii of the Truth, has now been recaptured into the Grid. Initially overwhelmed by the transhumance freedom of the concept, the priority now – as exemplified by the containment of astronomical data - is to encapsulate the huge amount of information available within defined grid cells, where seekers and researchers can access but also can be observed and controlled. The internet has become Netlock. Civilization has once again reemployed the Seasons of Peace, Order and Justice.

The Truth.

To what end? Transhumance and its intuition will never go away. Today, economic transhumance of a frightening scale still occurs, but it is no longer across open ground. It is driven not by seasonal rains but by the winds of war, depravation, cruelty, greed and absence of reason. It is found, in the suffocating airlessness of a wrongly sheparded road container, in the hostile repulsive seas of a continent once emboldened by the hopes and aspirations of previous migrants, in the vacant drug-extinguished eyes of transported sex workers, and in the hearts of ‘civilized’ men whose language has lost its voice.

Today’s transhumance retains a hope of expectation, yet that expectation flounders on the prioritisation of the Grid, where the language of Truth is denied to the newcomer, because we have forgotten what the Truth is.

The Truth is Freedom.

Kant said of ‘freedom’ that it is an ideal conception, which can never be comprehended or understood. Because nothing, including precedent or prioritisation, can explain it or support its Will then nothing remains except its defence. We must remove objections to Freedom rather than impose defined grids of justification. For the sake of all transhumance, let us ignore the prioritisations of Peace, Order and Justice and extend the Good Will of Freedom for its own sake alone.

Young grandson Leon and myself.

Leaving home.

By luck rather than design, and it is something that I appreciate with every breath I take, I have that Freedom.

It is nearly March, the month that I migrate... somewhere.

My next blog will be when I return from wherever that journey takes me.

Alphabetic Philosoup – E

An occasional blog:

an alphabetical abracadabra of language musings.

Erebus’ eternal expression ensures every era’s

empire eventually expires,

even exquisite Eridu.

.